If you are seeing this message, our style sheet has failed to load. Please try each of the following steps, in order, to fix it:

1) Clear your browser's cache and refresh the page.

2) Wait a few minutes, clear the cache again and refresh (one of our CDN servers may have had a short temporary outage).

3) Try accessing our site from another web browser on the same computer, AND from another computer on the same network. If either of those fixes it, you likely have software such as ad-block or Ghostery installed on the affected browser/computer. Please disable those to see if that fixes the issue.

4) Open a terminal window and type "ping cdn.staticstuff.net". Send us an email with the result.



Forums » Suggestions & Feature requests



Problem with Unique ID tags and filters

There seems to be a priority issue with Unique ID tags. It is helpful and possible to have both user and IP tagged, but IP takes precedence over user in the listings. It should be the other way around.

For instance say you have a company who's IP only resolves to the ISP name. I want to tag that IP with the company name. Say I tag a user at that company with his/her name. I would expect that if the tagged user appears on the site their name would be listed, if someone else from the company visits our site I want the company name to appear. Currently the company name always appears even if the users unique ID is tagged.

Could you please change the listing algorithm so that if(user && IP) {display user}
Easy way to do that, scan UIDs before IPs. Stop and display result with the first match.

Thanks,

Scott

Posted Thu Apr 5 2012 4:43pm by ScottWitte


Update: Now I'm confused. I just did the same thing, named both the user and the IP, but I did IP first. Now the user, not IP name is shown on lists. The only logic is alphabetical. In one case the user came before the company, alphabetically. The opposite was true on the other.

Hmmmmm. Are you by chance doing a brute force search of the Visitor tag database, sorted alphabetically, checking each entry for a match to the UID or IP and reporting the first match? If so it would mean a huge increase in processor overhead compared to a search on a UID/IP index. It would also give inconsistent results.

Scott

Posted Fri Apr 6 2012 3:26pm by ScottWitte



Reply to this discussion

You must be logged in to your account to post!